<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/34906829?origin\x3dhttp://hercules-girl.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
there's only me
宅女

Your photo here.

Girl:
I see.
I feel.
I walk.
I lived.


alternative reads

my foolish fren
my sister
jan
ed
kimoko
strapya world
Reebonz
Free samples
tech reviews
consoles n games at a bargain
ur fashion needs


confessions

This layout is done by Flamboyance.
Code references from Missyan.
1 2 3

Thursday, November 23, 2006

yupx.
m back.
feeling perturbed.

*laughs*

did i mention i will feel very disturbed should both books turn out to be great? well tt is definitely nt the case for feeling the way i m feeling.

the second had been great. only a little darker n i happened to b more inclined to the lighter one. but tt's beside the pt.

pt is the fact that a guy gave me books which translated into porn lit by A FREN.
(erms, keep tt to urself k. u noe i'm referring to u.)

anyway, it'll always b classified under chick lit in my library despite the explicit writing.


alrights less on books n more on myself. aftall, this is my island of self discovery.

first, let's start on one of the most impt part of my life. guys.

i've finally found someone worthy of the name "eyecandy" aft wat is close to a yr. during the jc days, loads of ppl came easily under the special category. i nearly lost count of the no. of ppl i spent my lectures eyeing.

HIM included.

back to my candy, he made me realised tt i've always been attracted to BOYS with braces. i guess it adds tt bashful n mischievious look tt nv fails to catch my eye. yes, i've always like BOYS, boys like all the previous hims who managed to break my heart even if it's only looking from afar.

i'm tt vulnerable. *smiles*

i guess tt has to be true to a certain extent as i've always fallen for ppl way below the 1.8 benchmark as BOYS aren't very tall most of the time.

even so, it makes me more than willing to bypass all check boxes when the "object" of attraction is beautiful. superficial but true, attracted to all things beautiful.

like HIM. long lashes tt nv seem to end, red lips like tt of snow white and the defined eyelids were just a few of the rest of the lovely features which took me off my feet.

back to my candy. barely 1.8 with braces and thick eyebrows (like HIM too) and big hands (another check box i ticked while shaking his hands).

ok, tt made me sound totally unfaithful which shouldn't b the case as growing up to b an independent woman make it acceptable to make tt additional glance to the guy who just walk past. furthermore, the 21st century's favourite word goes to equality right? which eventually equates to the fact tt since it's alright for HIM to take another peek at tt girl in minis, it's fine for me too.

only, the fact tt i've found candy material in sch drove him up to the wall with anger n jealousy despite the fact tt i was one of the last to fix my eye on 1.

mayb 1.5.

tt is if u consider my fren's candy coated in a white shirt.

make it 1.3 since my boy had looked tons better (n i mean TONS n TONS) even in a non-crisp white shirt.

i m a sucker for a combination of built n crisp white shirts by the way.

the image of HIM in his shirt is still so vividly good-looking tt it made me wonder all the pride n admiration i had, had anything to do with me being attached to him.


12:05 AM